« More evidence of middle class economic pain | Main | A “cap and trade” approach to greenhouse gases shrinks from the real issue. »
Monday
Oct202008

Do we really want a socialist for President?

Sarah Palin says Obama's proposed tax cuts for 95 percent of Americans sounds like socialism to her. She should know. She's governor of a State in which 99 percent of the land is owned by governments, and the Alaska State Permanent Fund sends exactly the same size welfare payment to every Alaskan every year ($3,269 in 2008) whether they are productive or idle. Or is that communism?

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Roger did you see that the contracts that Paulson made those 9 bank presidents sign left holders of common shares to collect full dividends? At least that's what I read....so this means that the taxpayers are after the shareholders of the failed banks?
October 21, 2008 | Unregistered Commenterchristine
That's right. "We" have preferred shares that have a liquidation preference over the common shares and probably no other meaningful rights. I do not think there are any presently-effective covenants that would restrict dividends or constrain management in any other meaningful way. What happens if there is a default in payment of the preferred dividend? I don't know. Warren Buffet charged more than twice as much for the preferred he put into Goldman. So we've done what I said we shouldn't do--make government capital so cheap it keeps private capital on the sidelines. http://www.realitybase.org/journal/2008/9/25/if-the-taxpayers-give-better-terms-to-troubled-financial-ins.html
October 21, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterSkeptic

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>