« Put healthcare to a vote, hope it is defeated, and move on. | Main | Consensus, the ultimate dog’s breakfast. In praise of just enough votes. »
Thursday
Mar042010

Obama’s political style in a nutshell

Toward the end of a long story about Mayor Daley's political career in The New Yorker is this description of the first public meeting between the mayor and candidate for US Senate Barack Obama in 2004:

[F]or all their differences of style and speech, Obama and Daley shared a basic approach to politics as a constant negotiation of interests and ideals—Chicago's brand of Realpolitik. Both had advanced by capitalizing on the prevailing power structure, not by dismantling it, and they were united, above all, not by ideology but by pragmatism.

That fits exactly with the impression I have formed by watching and listening to Obama for two years. At the top of Obama's agenda for change has been improving the tone of discourse and encouraging bi-partisan cooperation. That is not at all a desire to dismantle the prevailing power structure, but would merely make it easier for him to be a pragmatic leader. He has never had a liberal policy agenda or any other substantive agenda, in my view. He has readily accepted that his initial proposals about healthcare, Guantanamo, gay rights, government secrecy, executive powers, global warming, economic stimulus, financial regulation, etc. would have to be scaled back, but he has never wavered from his commitment to bipartisan reasoned discourse and cooperation. That's what he seems to really care about. He's a process guy and would probably be pleased with the notion that his tombstone might say something like, "He played a major role eliminating gridlock in the Congress and making government function effectively." Yes, he's said he admires FDR and Reagan because they led transformations, but I interpret that as his loving the idea that he might have a central role in some historical transformation rather than that he has a vision about a particular transformation he is committed to leading. Not that any of that is bad or disappointing or that it makes him at all unique among successful politicians. I offer it only as a model for interpreting what Obama does, predicting what he will do, understanding what he really cares about, and figuring out how he can and cannot be influenced.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

Well, his tombstone certainly won't read "Change you can believe in" and no one will believe in that again. So what is he going to run on next time?

March 6, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterChristine

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>